View All Home Blog Blogs

The Motorola XOOM – A Notebook Replacement?

by Pat Moorhead

In my last entry, I introduced the Motorola XOOM and provided my initial impressions on the experiential things I liked, things I’d like to see changed, and the unknown in  XOOM usability. This entry is a short look at how the dock and keyboard work and what it would take for me to replace my notebook with the XOOM.

XOOM with Wireless Keyboard

Motorola sells two docks, one with charging capability called the “Standard Dock” and one with speakers and HDMI-out called the “Speaker HD Dock”. They can both be connected to the wireless keyboard and it will even physically connect to the mouse.

  • Wireless keyboard at 10’: In the 10’, lean-back environment in front of the TV, I had to use the arrow keys to “point”.   I really needed some sort of real pointer, even given some of the quick shortcut functions on the keyboard. The mouse would physically connect, but not control anything.
  • Wireless Keyboard 2’: In the 2’ lean forward environment, the wireless keyboard was very usable. It is as large as a desktop keyboard without the number pad, so typing was quite enjoyable. Shortcuts include media, volume, music, web, chat, contacts, Gmail, and home. It operates similarly to the iPad keyboard in that pointing is still done with the finger.  I don’t feel comfortable reaching over the keyboard and touching the display, but that’s just me.

If I Wanted To Replace a Netbook or Notebook with XOOM

I often get asked the question,”so can this replace your notebook”? I have tried this on every tablet since I used my first tablet 20 years ago, so of course I would try it on the XOOM.  While the XOOM with keyboard and no mouse isn’t even close to optimal today, there is NOTHING technically keeping Google and OEMs from making this more elegant. Here is what I would do which could make me use my XOOM more instead of my notebook:

  1. Add mouse HID support to Honeycomb. This isn’t difficult as the mouse, like a finger, uses coordinates to map the screen. In fact, the mouse is easier to map coordinates.
  2. Substitute long-click with right click for the mouse on Honeycomb.
  3. Design a sexy case like the ZAGGmate which won Macworld CES 2011 Best of Show.
  4. Add some cheap flash storage memory to the dock for those who need more storage.
  5. Differentiate by adding an advanced natural user interface.  Add a fisheye lens, and using AMD Fusion to accelerate a virtual “hand-mouse” and near-field air gesturing. This is in addition to the inherent heterogeneous computing and graphical advantages AMD Fusion brings to the table.  I personally need more compute and graphical performance than tablets bring today.

Conclusion

The Motorola XOOM is a giant leap forward for Android tablets, delivered by the Honeycomb operating system and Tegra 2 hardware. It’s important to be precise in how the XOOM is evaluated, primarily looking at today, the next few months, then a few years off. Honeycomb isn’t perfect today, but if one uses Android 1.X as I did with the G1 for smartphones as historical precedent, it will be great.

Honeycomb shows an immense future capability to deliver an intuitive, useful and sexy interface. The look and feel could even rival Windows in many ways if Windows didn’t evolve past today’s Windows 7. Google will also be aggressively ramping their video, books and music services which really aren’t evident yet in today’s Honeycomb. The Android Market’s integration between PC, smartphone, tablet, and Chrome OS devices is unparalleled. The web browsing is the best I have ever experienced on a tablet and certainly better than the first-generation netbooks. BUT, right now, the XOOM isn’t as stable as it needs to be for widespread adoption today and it also shipped without important features operational, like SD memory, Flash video, 4G, Netflix, or Hulu.

Anyone like me who tried out the G1 smartphone on launch day knows what I am talking about here. Neither the G1 nor Android 1.0 was ready for prime time, yet a few years later they are poised to dominate smartphone OS market share. At launch, the G1 only had a handful of applications while the iPhone marketplace had 100′s of thousands. Since both the Android Market and Apple App Store are in the 100’s of thousands now, you’ll likely be able to find an app you’ll like on either platform.

Docking the XOOM and using the wireless keyboard is interesting. If Google and OEMs decided to enable some key features in software and hardware, it could give low end netbooks an experiential  run for their money and possibly provide the justification for users to buy a tablet first that could meet their clamshell needs by buying a cheap stand, keyboard, and mouse.  Price and complexity could still be the issue then because even cheap-add ons add up financially and add to the difficulty scale. Also, touch-enabled applications don’t work as well in a precision mouse environment, and vice-versa, so usability could still be an issue.

Have you tried the XOOM? Let me know your thoughts below.

Pat Moorhead is Corporate Vice President and Corporate Marketing Fellow and a Member of the Office of Strategy at AMD. His postings are his own opinions and may not represent AMD’s positions, strategies or opinions. Links to third party sites, and references to third party trademarks, are provided for convenience and illustrative purposes only. Unless explicitly stated, AMD is not responsible for the contents of such links, and no third party endorsement of AMD or any of its products is implied.

See Pat’s bio here or past blogs here.

Follow @PatrickMoorhead on Twitter.

SHARE: twitter stumble upon delicious facebook

COMMENTS: 6

6 Comments

  • Mark Broom March 22, 2011

    Patrick,

    I have also played with the Xoom and had an overall good experience. The one thing that I think will hold it back initially is like you said the overall CO$T vs. a $199-$300 netbook. The mouse issue will also hold people back and I really don’t think that it would be difficult to add in that functionality. I do like the overall look and feel of the OS but it definitely has some room to grow.

  • Will March 22, 2011

    Patrick, that was a great down to earth review. I honestly believe a Fusion APU would bring a device like the XOOM into desktop level performance. Tegra has been lacking vs ipad2 in alot of bechmarks. Has AMD considered an ARM venture? Can a petition help. I would love to see AMD bring its game to a non-x86 arena.

  • Veer March 24, 2011

    We all need more GPU performance. I used a Nexus once, and the lack of overall snappiness made me realize that using it would be maddening for me.

    However x86 in a tablet is an accident waiting to happen :S

    For an AMD/ATI fanboy like me its hard to stomach, but nVidia has the better longterm plan building ARM processors for mobile (also much cooler code names)

    :(

    Dell XPS 8000
    Core i7 860
    ATI 4850 (hoping for a 6850)

  • asH March 28, 2011

    I think most people miss the fact that for raw cpu power APU’s are the way to go. ARM chips cant run x86 programs, and would probably not work with crunching an excel spreadsheet, or beat APU’s on processing speed- tablets are nice for entertainment but cant handle the workload of an APU. APU’s are for productive persons- which is why E-350 is going to do well in netbooks (add an SSD and its a monster relative to anything in that space).
    asH

  • BuyemHoldem April 4, 2011

    I am a big AMD & Fusion fan & shareholder and my personal opinion of tablets/slates is that they are CUTE. Personally, I could only use one for checking eMail or web browsing… but wait, I could do that on an iPhone.

    With that said, AMD’s stock performance will never get back to the 2006 price levels unless AMD does something about implementing an ARM processor. Just look what it did for the stock performance of NVDA and if Nvidia can do it AMD should be able to do it much easier, especially since we are now fabless and without the large capital expenditure requirements (unlike INTC).

    QCOM and NVDA may pose bigger long term threats to AMD than INTC currently does and an ARM-based AMD APU would be a huge kick in the teeth to INTC.

  • Eli April 25, 2011

    Where did you get that case that holds the Xoom tablet, the dock, and the keyboard in one case that I see in the image? I want it.

Submit a Comment

Connect with Facebook

Reminder about Comments:

All comments will be moderated by AMD before they are published. Unrelated comments or requests for support will not be published. Please post your technical questions in the AMD Forums or for drivers and other support resources visit AMD Support. By submitting a comment, you are agreeing to AMD Terms and Conditions.