<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Truth is Stranger than Fiction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/2009/05/06/truth-is-stranger-than-fiction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/2009/05/06/truth-is-stranger-than-fiction/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:39:19 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: johny5</title>
		<link>http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/2009/05/06/truth-is-stranger-than-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>johny5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 16:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/?p=230#comment-187</guid>
		<description>Hello Mr Dessau ,great blog post there.

I&#039;m interested in the mentioned AVX support. Will future core in 2011 be 100% compatible with mentioned version 5 of AVX specification? Will this mean a previous SSE4.x,SSSE3 and other SIMD extensions will be supported and extended to 256b?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Mr Dessau ,great blog post there.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m interested in the mentioned AVX support. Will future core in 2011 be 100% compatible with mentioned version 5 of AVX specification? Will this mean a previous SSE4.x,SSSE3 and other SIMD extensions will be supported and extended to 256b?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surya Adi Nugraha S</title>
		<link>http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/2009/05/06/truth-is-stranger-than-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Surya Adi Nugraha S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 23:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/?p=230#comment-181</guid>
		<description>Typical consumer end user did not care about instructions, only programmer much care of it. Programmer wants that their programs executed much faster with right compiler.

Your company microprocessor and Graphics processing is good but you must think about unified solutions that your products offered into platforms. Your marketing strategy in Dragon platform and Puma platform is good too. I think there is a missing in your portable product. That is wireless. Your company first wifi chipset the Am 1772 wireless chipset did not success to hardware vendor and this wireless product did not developed further.
If your company could combine a good wireless product into future portable computing platform, it will become better solutions. It will be more valuable to customer if this wireless chipset is your company product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typical consumer end user did not care about instructions, only programmer much care of it. Programmer wants that their programs executed much faster with right compiler.</p>
<p>Your company microprocessor and Graphics processing is good but you must think about unified solutions that your products offered into platforms. Your marketing strategy in Dragon platform and Puma platform is good too. I think there is a missing in your portable product. That is wireless. Your company first wifi chipset the Am 1772 wireless chipset did not success to hardware vendor and this wireless product did not developed further.<br />
If your company could combine a good wireless product into future portable computing platform, it will become better solutions. It will be more valuable to customer if this wireless chipset is your company product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
