<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AMD Fusion, or up to 8X More Performance for No Extra Cost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/2009/06/16/amd-fusion-or-up-to-8x-more-performance-for-no-extra-cost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/2009/06/16/amd-fusion-or-up-to-8x-more-performance-for-no-extra-cost/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:39:19 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rasmus Dahl-Sorensen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/2009/06/16/amd-fusion-or-up-to-8x-more-performance-for-no-extra-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>Rasmus Dahl-Sorensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 13:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/?p=282#comment-408</guid>
		<description>Please make a plugin for Sony Vegas Pro, too!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please make a plugin for Sony Vegas Pro, too!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Diaz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/2009/06/16/amd-fusion-or-up-to-8x-more-performance-for-no-extra-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Diaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/?p=282#comment-331</guid>
		<description>Andrew, speaking on Stream, any word on when we might start seeing Physics enabled games for the AMD Platform?

While Phys x isn&#039;t a huge player yet, seeing some HAVOK support on these new guys might be kind of nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, speaking on Stream, any word on when we might start seeing Physics enabled games for the AMD Platform?</p>
<p>While Phys x isn&#8217;t a huge player yet, seeing some HAVOK support on these new guys might be kind of nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Fox for Nigel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/2009/06/16/amd-fusion-or-up-to-8x-more-performance-for-no-extra-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Fox for Nigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/?p=282#comment-305</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the comment and input.  We are taking feedback on the Adobe Premiere Pro beta and will decide on final deployment after we evaluate that input.  Our OpenCL activity continues apace, with an expected public beta of our unified CPU / GPU development environment coming in Q3.  And yes, ATI Stream is our brand for AMD&#039;s approach toward balancing workloads between GPU and CPU resources, including OpenCL.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the comment and input.  We are taking feedback on the Adobe Premiere Pro beta and will decide on final deployment after we evaluate that input.  Our OpenCL activity continues apace, with an expected public beta of our unified CPU / GPU development environment coming in Q3.  And yes, ATI Stream is our brand for AMD&#8217;s approach toward balancing workloads between GPU and CPU resources, including OpenCL.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/2009/06/16/amd-fusion-or-up-to-8x-more-performance-for-no-extra-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/?p=282#comment-298</guid>
		<description>This is very exciting stuff. I&#039;ve been anticipating it for a while. It&#039;s also very clever from a marketing standpoint. AMD can use their technologies (for the mean time) to require an AMD CPU for a functioning Stream Accelerated Adobe Premiere CS4 work enviroment. It effectively hits the two major competitors in their respective weak spots. Albeit, in a small market.

The question is though, how long until we see a finalized product? I&#039;ve been on the ATi/AMD GPGPU bandwagon for years and I&#039;ve seen lots of tech announced then buried. Especially with OpenCL right around the corner... Is this going to be kept going? Or is this a neat marketing ploy... ;)

When OpenCL finally becomes mature and work starts getting poured behind it, it&#039;s going to be much harder to capitalize on the exclusivety of Stream. Hopefully though, OpenCL will allow AMD to reallocate resources from specialized GPGPU software development like this project to something else. After all, it will be the software vendors duty to write correct OpenCL code. 

Has it been announced if the Stream title will still be held as AMD GPGPU initiative after OpenCL is widely used? Sure would be nice... Those other two companies stick their names on everything... &quot;***** Inside&quot; or &quot;The Way it&#039;s meant to be ******&quot;. I&#039;d get such a smirk if I saw an ATi Stream logo on the next version of the Sony Vegas splash screen. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very exciting stuff. I&#8217;ve been anticipating it for a while. It&#8217;s also very clever from a marketing standpoint. AMD can use their technologies (for the mean time) to require an AMD CPU for a functioning Stream Accelerated Adobe Premiere CS4 work enviroment. It effectively hits the two major competitors in their respective weak spots. Albeit, in a small market.</p>
<p>The question is though, how long until we see a finalized product? I&#8217;ve been on the ATi/AMD GPGPU bandwagon for years and I&#8217;ve seen lots of tech announced then buried. Especially with OpenCL right around the corner&#8230; Is this going to be kept going? Or is this a neat marketing ploy&#8230; <img src='http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>When OpenCL finally becomes mature and work starts getting poured behind it, it&#8217;s going to be much harder to capitalize on the exclusivety of Stream. Hopefully though, OpenCL will allow AMD to reallocate resources from specialized GPGPU software development like this project to something else. After all, it will be the software vendors duty to write correct OpenCL code. </p>
<p>Has it been announced if the Stream title will still be held as AMD GPGPU initiative after OpenCL is widely used? Sure would be nice&#8230; Those other two companies stick their names on everything&#8230; &#8220;***** Inside&#8221; or &#8220;The Way it&#8217;s meant to be ******&#8221;. I&#8217;d get such a smirk if I saw an ATi Stream logo on the next version of the Sony Vegas splash screen. <img src='http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frantz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/2009/06/16/amd-fusion-or-up-to-8x-more-performance-for-no-extra-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Frantz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/?p=282#comment-288</guid>
		<description>@martin,

I don&#039;t think this will happen.

On their way to global domination, Nvidia forgot about their most important customer and decided to court Intel instead. It&#039;s like leaving your girlfriend to go after the next hottie and being turned down with no way back!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@martin,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think this will happen.</p>
<p>On their way to global domination, Nvidia forgot about their most important customer and decided to court Intel instead. It&#8217;s like leaving your girlfriend to go after the next hottie and being turned down with no way back!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Dessau</title>
		<link>http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/2009/06/16/amd-fusion-or-up-to-8x-more-performance-for-no-extra-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Dessau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/?p=282#comment-287</guid>
		<description>Well yes and no. We have updated the footnote toindicate the file size of 367 MB. 

However regardless of size a reduction from 372.5s to 47.3s is still a huge improvement. Whether 47.3s is good compared to other systems or approaches does requires the file-size - thus provided.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well yes and no. We have updated the footnote toindicate the file size of 367 MB. </p>
<p>However regardless of size a reduction from 372.5s to 47.3s is still a huge improvement. Whether 47.3s is good compared to other systems or approaches does requires the file-size &#8211; thus provided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/2009/06/16/amd-fusion-or-up-to-8x-more-performance-for-no-extra-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/?p=282#comment-286</guid>
		<description>It is interesting, I hope AMD will join NVIDIA in their upcoming GPU conference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting, I hope AMD will join NVIDIA in their upcoming GPU conference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/2009/06/16/amd-fusion-or-up-to-8x-more-performance-for-no-extra-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/?p=282#comment-284</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s nice that this plug in works on regular Radeon cards and not just workstation cards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nice that this plug in works on regular Radeon cards and not just workstation cards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LS</title>
		<link>http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/2009/06/16/amd-fusion-or-up-to-8x-more-performance-for-no-extra-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>LS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/?p=282#comment-280</guid>
		<description>But Apple&#039;s Snow Leopard does not support OpenCL in Radeon 2000 &amp; 3000 series.  More Nvidia GPU are supported.  It is very disappointed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Apple&#8217;s Snow Leopard does not support OpenCL in Radeon 2000 &amp; 3000 series.  More Nvidia GPU are supported.  It is very disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frantz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/2009/06/16/amd-fusion-or-up-to-8x-more-performance-for-no-extra-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>Frantz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/?p=282#comment-279</guid>
		<description>&quot;When installed, the plug-in encoded an H.264, 1440×1080i 29.97 frames-per-second, High Quality file in 47.3s; without the plug-in, Adobe Premiere Pro encoded the same file in 372.5s &quot;

What was the size of the input file?

With no input file size these numbers means absolutely nothing!!!

F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;When installed, the plug-in encoded an H.264, 1440×1080i 29.97 frames-per-second, High Quality file in 47.3s; without the plug-in, Adobe Premiere Pro encoded the same file in 372.5s &#8221;</p>
<p>What was the size of the input file?</p>
<p>With no input file size these numbers means absolutely nothing!!!</p>
<p>F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Bartow</title>
		<link>http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/2009/06/16/amd-fusion-or-up-to-8x-more-performance-for-no-extra-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Bartow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.amd.com/nigeldessau/?p=282#comment-278</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget about the Mac.  My MacPro with Radeon 4000 series card could use that power as well.  I&#039;m hoping with the advent of OpenCL in the next iteration of Mac OS X it will become a reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget about the Mac.  My MacPro with Radeon 4000 series card could use that power as well.  I&#8217;m hoping with the advent of OpenCL in the next iteration of Mac OS X it will become a reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
