Evaluate and Innovate?


1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (8 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

 

For some broad thoughts on AMD’s approach to marketing, particularly social media and other cost-effective ways (say, a blog!) to reach our audiences, please take a moment and read this Q&A that B2B Magazine was kind enough to publish online as their “CMO Close Up.”  While their audience tends to be marketing types like me, your response to the Q&A would be a great check for me on whether you agree we’re being smart about reaching, well, you.

 

I look forward to reading your comments.

 

 

Nigel Dessau is senior vice president and chief marketing officer at AMD. His postings are his own opinions and may not represent AMD’s positions, strategies or opinions. Links to third party sites are provided for convenience and unless explicitly stated, AMD is not responsible for the contents of such links sites and no endorsement is implied.

Tagged with: ,

  1. #1 by Robert Seymour - August 12th, 2009 at 16:07

    I love to keep up with the latest developments at AMD.

    I’m not sure how helpful this will be, but I’d like to throw a few ideas out there you might consider: Make your “press room” web address easier to remember. Have relevant, attractive product demonstration videos, as well as graphics and images FROM those videos. A while ago, I picked up a small pamphlet at Fry’s Electronics that explained AMD Turion processors &c. I really like that kind of printed material, even though it is not widely published and distributed. Last of all, have some dialog with game developers, especially those who are developing new game engines. …and John D. Carmack of iD Software.

  2. #2 by Nigel Dessau - August 12th, 2009 at 17:06

    Thanks – will pass the ideas onto the press team.

  3. #3 by Surya - August 12th, 2009 at 23:22

    what is the key measurement that your marketing efforts perceived success :
    1. Differentiates
    Don’t copy the competitor. If your competitor put logos in every machine that includes their products, use anonymity to OEM. Encourages them to differentiates the strenght of their products that includes your chip product with features or places your company logo products that have more advantages than competitor. Encourages other semiconductor players with their uniqueness to strengthening your products.
    2. Averages prices using your key strength products
    The completes platform with affordable prices will get more buyer than pricey products. But, don’t sacrifice the features for lower prices.
    3. Uses the excellent distributors.
    The weakness of your partner will deteriorates your company to reach more customers.
    4. Encourages retailer to put your products displayed in places that easily seen by consumers
    5. Gives chance to OEM with their own marketing words with every products that powered with your company chips.
    6. Don’t take too much efforts to counter your competitor except misleading marketing campaign.
    Use your energy to encourages your strenght and give impression to customer that you can get enough performances directly feel to consumer.
    7. See the small things as a big things that if you use that you can change the world.
    8. Extrovert personality within smart minds.
    Put more responsibility to the most creative persons with flexible personality in your team. So you can get more business relations with successful marketing efforts.
    9. Gives chance to futurist for platform planning.
    10. See your lesser enemy as partner to counter the big enemy.
    You can joint with them in press conference for their company products that exclusively supports your another products that they did not have.
    11. Sales and marketing within one packet
    Gives bonus for every products that purchased by consumer.
    12. Geographically unchallenged
    Put as much as possible your representativeness in any part in the world.

    • #4 by asH - August 13th, 2009 at 20:02

      Surya, these vendors have an intel bias. The only real advantage i7’s have over Phenom II currently (vista, XP)is hyperthreading; and that goes away in Windows 7,and OpenCL..remember microsoft had to optimize Windows 7 (how much more code?)for hyperthreading (sidebar- Intel pushes Windows 7 for corporate use- can you say-payoff). AMD’s fight is with all of the WINtel vendors…will multicores do away with hyperthreading? all depends on CPUGPU advantage on Windows 7 and DirectX 11…
      now realize Intel is aware of this; and they dont have an answer

  4. #5 by Ron Thompson - August 13th, 2009 at 11:04

    I have a emachines computer that is apprx 6 yrs old now and was trying to find out some information on the AMD processor in it.(Sempron 3300+) I searched everywhere on the AMD site and was not able to locate any information on it at all. Due to poor navigation also, I couldn’t locate how to send anything to tech support! You manufactured & distributed this item, and don’t even have any information on it?? Whats with that…

  5. #6 by asH - August 13th, 2009 at 20:16

    apps are the key-

    Photoshop-speedy photo rendering tools
    Excel- can I finally 10 sheets of data and VB to run instantaneous.
    Access- run the way its suppose to
    Nortons Antivirus- to really run in the background

    wishlist

    • #7 by Nigel Dessau - August 14th, 2009 at 07:58

      Thanks – we have plug-ins for Photoshop, Premier, Sony Vegas and others coming out that use GPUs to help reduce rendering times. I use them all the time. More coming over the next few months. Not sure we have discussed Office and AV. Will look into it.

  6. #8 by asH - August 14th, 2009 at 21:05

    I just had an epiphanic moment-
    It’s no doubt Intel spared no expense to claim the top gun prize over AMD with the hyper-i7’s; but at what hyper-expense? In this economic environment Intel has got to be taking a beating with these expensive hyper-i7’s, and in no way can they lower the price without an earnings beating (not to positive during the earning call). netbooks, low end comp’s are further clipping at their margins. The game plan now , if they hope to show positive earnings, is to (do as they promised Microsoft) upgrade corporate comp’s with their chips and Microsoft 7. Hence the i5’s (I hear no hyper),a strip down affortable version of the i7’s chocked full-o-features (WHAT no hyper?), reasonably priced for this ecconomic environment, I believe that’s why the hush hush.
    I might add that this is all speculation on my part, but it’s logical. an AMD opportunity into the corporate world? make them an offer they cant refuse.
    asH

    Reply

  7. #9 by asH - August 15th, 2009 at 20:21

    KISS GPGPU
    As I pondered the future of future chips and platforms, my mind drifted to past computer developments the things that worked and those that didn’t. Over the weekend Tim Sweeney dis’ed GPGPU; more so that he’s still pissed about ATI’s pre release of Quake 3, and of course Intel’s promises promises.

    He thus provides an example, saying that it costs “X” amount of money to develop an efficient single-threaded algorithm for CPUs. To develop a multithreaded version, it will cost double the amount; three times the amount to develop for the Cell/PlayStation 3, and a whopping ten times the amount for a current GPGPU version. He said that developing anything over 2X is simply “uneconomic” for most software companies. To harness today’s technology, companies must lengthen development time and dump more money into the project, two factors that no company can currently afford.

    And you know, he’s right; who wants to double, triple the amount of time to program? and to what monetary advantage? AMD can appreciate this approach; they use it as performance-per-watt. Initially GPGPU should be an instant performance boost to any (CPGPU)compiled program. The language can be simple ala C++ (for modularity), or OpenCL. That program’s performance should increase when on a GPGPU system, while the programmer should be able to dial up the performance as they decide. A scenario like this may play out:
    C++ ,or a slight C++ hybrid structured language tuned for GPGPU is created, AMD’s CPCPU compilers compile the modular C++ program for CPGPU environment- abracadabra instant performance gains …KISS (Keep It Simple- Somebody)
    My thoughts are that the modularity/structured nature of C++ would be easier to place markers for general CPGPU resources. Later if the programmer chooses he can dial up the performance with more code.

    asH

    • #10 by asH - August 15th, 2009 at 20:38

      less code, faster (if not comparable)= cost effective over Hyper

  8. #11 by Ken Hubbard - August 18th, 2009 at 22:20

    Mr. Seymore has some good ideas. His thoughts on a simple URL for the blog page, pretty smart. Since I am a relatively new follower of Blogs and especially AMD’s I may not be of any true value to their social media direction.

    Another question that has me perplexed, there seems to be a measurable amount of strength in the AMD blogs for consumer products and gadgets, which I love of course, but was looking for more on AMD’s thoughts on the future of moving data to those gadgets and homes. The data center equipment side.

    Am I missing a blog, or overlooking one? Anyway, AMD, being strong in the video and games markets, I would suspect, is looking to grab market share in other verticals.

    Or are they just looking to increase penetration in the Media & Entertainment segments. Either way, how would/will social media be exploited to achieve their goals?

  9. #12 by asH - August 19th, 2009 at 19:54

    In recent benchmark tests (AnandTech.com) of the i7 965 vs Phenom BE 965, the Excel benchmark produced a remarkable advantage of 46.6%. reorganizing the benchmark list from highest advantage to lowest advantage Intel’s i7 has over the Phenom tells another story. Far Cry is optimized for Intel chips probably using SSE (SSE4.1/2) extensions not included in AMD cpu’s. A little digging reveals many if not all of the 20+ % differences are due to vendor optimizations towards Intel cpu’s. Note game performance is even, while most suspect benchmarks fall within reasonable parameters

    Excel 0.466
    x264HD 0.358
    POV-Ray 0.356
    3dsmax 0.324
    Blender 0.312
    Soren5 0.299
    Sony 0.293
    CS3 0.289
    Far Cry 0.28
    WinRAR 0.263
    CineMT 0.255
    DataRec 0.244
    DivX685 0.240
    SysPro 0.175
    Sys3D 0.155
    E Learn 0.144
    WinMedi 0.143
    Sys 2007 0.139
    CineB ST 0.119
    x264HD 0.094
    SysVid 0.076
    Crysis 0.062
    LeftDead 0.011
    Fallout -0.008

    Et tu,Brute?
    Microsofts Excel’s eye opening 46% had me wondering; until I stumbled on a current eweek magazine, article:
    Intel Parallel Studio helps developers exploit multiple cores
    Review: Intel tools work hand-in-hand with Microsoft Visual Studio
    This is a remarkable product, if Intel optimizations did (no doubt) help produce these eye popping results; it’s a cause for concern: why couldn’t AMD capitalize? Is there a conspiracy theory? Are SSE4.1/2 extensions extensively used to undermine AMD’s attempts? And are the software vendors involved?
    The more important concern is the stripped down i5 line of cpu’s , if Microsoft Office on a i5 can hold an advantage over Phenom’s at lower prices; that’s not a good thing, and Intel will reap huge margins selling these crap chips to corporate internationals, while AMD will get the Intel shaft once again, then rule the world.
    Your mission if you decide to accept it, is to create a plugin for Microsoft Office and popular programs (CS3/4) to expose Intel’s cheap i5’s, along with their plot to take over the world…
    Should you or any of your AMD staff get caught and fail, the market will disavow any knowledge of your existence.

    Goodluck Mr. Phelps

  10. #13 by asH - August 19th, 2009 at 20:02

    replace – Note game performance is even, while most suspect benchmarks fall within reasonable parameters

    Note game performance is even on both chips, while most non-suspect benchmarks fall within reasonable parameters

  11. #14 by colin - August 24th, 2009 at 18:29

    I found the article containing this comment : “The first generation of multi-core processors just stuck cores on a die” to be really “buttering up” to Intel (as if AMD hadn’t been first to create integrated cache on true dual cores years before).

    Here’s the full article in question: http://www.internetnews.com/hardware/article.php/3835991

    Maybe they need to be reminded along with their readers.

  12. #15 by Pierre - September 16th, 2009 at 10:47

    What is needed during tough times is bold inspiring achievements that can be understood at first glance by everybody.

    People need to see that you provide them with a competitive advantage that directly translates into tangible value -for them.

    The WinTel platform has lost this inspiring leap a long time ago because of the less obvious value that users feel they get for their bucks.

    There’s one thing that drives I.T. today: web services, web developments, cloud, grid, computing, storage, all will move to the web.

    Surfing on this wave requires a big bold example that talks to people.

    Here is one: http://trustleap.ch/

    TrustLeap G-WAN (108 KB) is up to 38x faster than Apache, up to 25x faster than Nginx.

    And its ANSI C scripts are 5x faster than ASP.Net C# on IIS 7.0.

    Those figures strike the imagination: IIS 7.0 weights 501 MB and is slower (in the kernel) than G-WAN (in user-mode).

    G-WAN has been released by a single person. It is free for everyone.

    Show the world how G-WAN rocks on AMD CPUs!
    Beat new records!

    Tell the world how seriously you are involved and make it easier for people to do what they want to do.

    Then, you will get market share.

    Hope it helps.

*
* (it won't be published)
Your Comment:*
* denotes a required field
We moderate the comments submitted to our blogs. Please do not submit your comment twice -- it will appear shortly.
  1. No trackbacks yet.