So if I am not the in-house “social media expert”, web guy, or IT guy, why do I care about our new blog platform the team is rolling out next week? Well, I am a strategy guy and social media has been invaluable to have real-time conversations with some real smart folks in the community. I have also used social media to create new relationships and make existing ones stronger. Plus it’s real time and productive, I love the efficiency of 140-character ideation.
So I am excited about some new features in our blogs we are rolling out for readers like you and authors like me. Here is a run-down of the feature highlights you should see next week.
For readers (You):
- Post rating - Ability to rate each post. You can tell me if you like the post or if you think it stinks.
- Polls – Tell us quickly what you think. Participating in polls helps us out, too.
- ShareThis – allows you to send a post to the social network of your choice.
- Look & feel – New look and feel that’s easier to read and navigate
- Video content inside posts – No we didn’t have that before… shame. (head shaking). Look Mom, a real video:
- Threaded comments - Comments are still easy to submit and with threading, you can now see where the conversation is going more easily. There’s a “reply-to” option that notifies you if you want to hear about all replies to a post.
- Easy comment authentication – If you are already signed up on OpenID and Gravatar, login and you are commenting. Asking people to exclusively sign up for your site is “so 2008”.
- Improved smartphone view – View the blog better from mobile devices like the iPhone and iPod Touch. OK, I wanted it optimized for Bold, Storm, and G1 Android too, but maybe later.
For Authors (You and I):
- Posting flexibility- I want to blog the moment I get that “big idea”- no matter where I am.
I get increased flexibility of where I can post, doing it through ping.fm, iPhone, etc. without a SecureID dongle which I needed on our old system. This means I can more quickly start conversations and blog more often and spend less time doing it. I used to go from a)Word to b)LiveWriter to c)LiveWriter and fix broken content to d) old platform tool to e) fix broken content in old platform tool to f) publish. This removes most of those steps.
- Improved rich media tools- I won’t even bore you with how many steps I would need to go through to post media. Don’t get me started. I can do it now and do it fast. You want videos and audio, we got it.
- Comment SPAM filtering- I used to get 50 per day. That’s real productive.
I’d hate to look at my inbox in the morning. For the last time, no, I don’t want Cialis or oil paintings.
- Robust tracking & measurement- Let me know what interests you and what doesn’t. Simple. You don’t care, I don’t write.
So we hope YOU like the new blogs and features. Please tell us what you think; we’ve made it much easier to do so.
Pat Moorhead is Vice President of Advanced Marketing at AMD. His postings are his own opinions and may not represent AMD’s positions, strategies or opinions. Links to third party sites are provided for convenience and unless explicitly stated, AMD is not responsible for the contents of such linked sites and no endorsement is implied.



(8 votes, average: 3.50 out of 5)






#1 by Bryan Bartow - March 11th, 2009 at 09:34
Much better than the older system, although it looks like your image links are all broken, at least in this post.
#2 by Patrick Moorhead - March 11th, 2009 at 12:15
@Bryan Bartow, Thanks, Bryan. Pics fixed. Multiple autosaves overwriting content.
#3 by John Stanton - March 12th, 2009 at 11:28
Hey Pat-
Nice new platform. Looking good. Though it seems curious that when i’m on the page for an actual post, the date of the post isn’t mentioned anywhere? for instance, from this page, i have no idea what day this post went live. I just know that Bryan B. commented on 3/11….
#4 by Patrick Moorhead - March 12th, 2009 at 11:33
@John Stanton, Good catch. It shows on the http://blogs.amd.com/patmoorhead/ page, not the post itself. Quick question, why is that important? Freshness?
#5 by Rambaldi - March 23rd, 2009 at 03:41
@Patrick Moorhead, I am going through a bunch of old posts catching up on the feeds. (want to read them all) There is a small lightly coloured line showing:
“This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 10th, 2009, 10:33 am…” which was a bit easy to miss at first so perhaps make it more prominent.
#6 by Patrick Moorhead - March 24th, 2009 at 07:40
@Rambaldi, I understand now. Thanks for the feedback! If it’s not apparent when the post was posted, we need to make that more prominent.
#7 by John McElhenney - March 12th, 2009 at 21:55
“Well done Patrick and team. Looks like there’s some great stuff ahead. Did you consider adding the Disqus comment system too? And how will this all look on my BB Pearl in OperaMini?
I ask too much, I know.
Great job team!
Patrick: what if the oil painting were “”condo-sized?”"”
#8 by Patrick Moorhead - March 15th, 2009 at 06:34
@John McElhenney, Thanks for the question. We are looking at Disqus for next stage. How does it look with a Pearl?
#9 by Sean - March 17th, 2009 at 10:59
Hey Pat!
I was wondering what happened to ya! Checked your blog down for some info, which i cannot remember what it was now, and it was 404. These days, 404’s bad, mmmkay?
To point… What platform are you guys using?
I’m moving GTR’s site to Joomla. Most the functionality I saw here will be in our new site as well.
I understand the openid principle. I don’t like it though. ‘Just seems like an attempt to pool consumer data. I’m still in favor of unique ids.
Overall, well done! Looks nice!
Sean
#10 by Sean - March 17th, 2009 at 11:10
This may be my “noobness”, but how to access the post-rating feature was not apparent.
I looked three times, and I didn’t see where to rate this thread.
Sean
#11 by Patrick Moorhead - March 25th, 2009 at 11:14
@Sean, You were right. It was busted. Thanks for bringing it to our attention. Fixed now!
#12 by Sean - March 17th, 2009 at 12:36
Speaking of features, it would be nice to have an “edit” comment function. My first reply has an error in it(which i dont think i can fix).
Sean
#13 by Patrick Moorhead - March 25th, 2009 at 11:13
@Sean, we will look into that next rev.
#14 by Anaman - March 18th, 2009 at 18:00
hitting Itel where it matters most.
So i had a random thought today on how AMD could defeat intel badly enough to maybe make them back off.
for many years you two companies have been racing to produce the fastest and most efficient chips to ship on new computers.
what would happen if you were to produce multi core chips that are slower, more efficient, consume less power and produce way less heat than anything on the market. it would be amazing if they would work with older machines as well but that too is just a pipe dream. hopefully their lower cost would be a blow to intel forcing them to rethink their silly legal threats.
#15 by Patrick Moorhead - March 24th, 2009 at 07:42
@Anaman, Thanks for the input. The great thing about silicon is that anything is possible. We weigh these tradeoffs every day on our roadmap planning. All chip guys, not just AMD, are looking at scenarios like this.
#16 by Robert Hallock - March 20th, 2009 at 11:43
All these features are really great, Patrick! I’ve had a great time talking to you on Twitter, and it’s awesome to see AMD engage their customers and supporters so directly and robustly.
Good choice on Wordpress, and your SM features (ratings, videos, etc.) are great too.
Let me know when that BB Bold optimization hits.
Do want!
#17 by Patrick Moorhead - March 20th, 2009 at 11:48
Thanks, I love the dialogue. We cranked out the new platform in 10 days from idea to launch. Trying to speed things up. We are bound to make some mistakes, but we learn from them and move on!
#18 by Cliff Forster - March 24th, 2009 at 20:45
http://icrontic.com/articles/a-look-at-amds-daring-social-media-strategy
Hey Patrick, just thought we would promote your blog, with a blog, how clever…..
Love what your doing.
#19 by Jessicatooft - May 10th, 2009 at 13:38
I really very liked this post. Can I copy it to my blog? Thank you in advance. Sincerely