<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MobileMark 2007, the Apps, and your Notebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.amd.com/patmoorhead/2009/06/17/mobilemark-2007-the-apps-and-your-notebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.amd.com/patmoorhead/2009/06/17/mobilemark-2007-the-apps-and-your-notebook/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:19:58 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TheTwistedTeam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.amd.com/patmoorhead/2009/06/17/mobilemark-2007-the-apps-and-your-notebook/comment-page-1/#comment-1263</link>
		<dc:creator>TheTwistedTeam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.amd.com/patmoorhead/?p=1146#comment-1263</guid>
		<description>hadi - the main differences are two:
AMD&#039;s CPUs are cheaper.
Intel ones are faster and consume less power.

To anyone that will try to answer to this (if anyone approves those comments at all): we do not use MM07, yet we think it&#039;s better than none. We also think you invest too much resources in writing about something so unimportantas testing methods. You will fail to make a reasonable point to influential tech teams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hadi &#8211; the main differences are two:<br />
AMD&#8217;s CPUs are cheaper.<br />
Intel ones are faster and consume less power.</p>
<p>To anyone that will try to answer to this (if anyone approves those comments at all): we do not use MM07, yet we think it&#8217;s better than none. We also think you invest too much resources in writing about something so unimportantas testing methods. You will fail to make a reasonable point to influential tech teams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hadi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.amd.com/patmoorhead/2009/06/17/mobilemark-2007-the-apps-and-your-notebook/comment-page-1/#comment-1163</link>
		<dc:creator>hadi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 12:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.amd.com/patmoorhead/?p=1146#comment-1163</guid>
		<description>can u tell me the different between amd and intel product.the lattest product for notebook..hope i will get the answer as soon as posibble...thank</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can u tell me the different between amd and intel product.the lattest product for notebook..hope i will get the answer as soon as posibble&#8230;thank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surya</title>
		<link>http://blogs.amd.com/patmoorhead/2009/06/17/mobilemark-2007-the-apps-and-your-notebook/comment-page-1/#comment-1096</link>
		<dc:creator>Surya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.amd.com/patmoorhead/?p=1146#comment-1096</guid>
		<description>I hope AMD will use their former employee that have competence with their skill designing network controller that have been discontinue in last century. I hope you hiring david stoenner who have experience as field applications engineer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope AMD will use their former employee that have competence with their skill designing network controller that have been discontinue in last century. I hope you hiring david stoenner who have experience as field applications engineer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Forster</title>
		<link>http://blogs.amd.com/patmoorhead/2009/06/17/mobilemark-2007-the-apps-and-your-notebook/comment-page-1/#comment-1095</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff Forster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.amd.com/patmoorhead/?p=1146#comment-1095</guid>
		<description>This Newsweek article is intertesting.  http://www.newsweek.com/id/202572.  Apparently the word is getting out to the tech press.  When will consumers express outrage?  We are being lied to!  Here is what I suggest.  Everyone that reads this, and cares about this issue, go to twitter.com, twitter every tech journalist, every electronics retail rep, every computer manufacturer rep you can think of and tell that Mobile Mark 07 is not fooling you.

So here is the tweet.

Mobile Mark 07 is not fooling me.  What should we do about this? http://www.newsweek.com/id/202572

Here is a list of influential tech people to get us started on our twitter campaign.  

http://twitter.com/Pogue

http://twitter.com/Scobleizer

http://twitter.com/BestBuyCMO

http://twitter.com/LeoLaporte

http://twitter.com/THErealDVORAK

http://twitter.com/LanceUlanoff

http://twitter.com/chrispirillo

http://twitter.com/ChrisBatDell

Happy tweeting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Newsweek article is intertesting.  <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/202572" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsweek.com/id/202572</a>.  Apparently the word is getting out to the tech press.  When will consumers express outrage?  We are being lied to!  Here is what I suggest.  Everyone that reads this, and cares about this issue, go to twitter.com, twitter every tech journalist, every electronics retail rep, every computer manufacturer rep you can think of and tell that Mobile Mark 07 is not fooling you.</p>
<p>So here is the tweet.</p>
<p>Mobile Mark 07 is not fooling me.  What should we do about this? <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/202572" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsweek.com/id/202572</a></p>
<p>Here is a list of influential tech people to get us started on our twitter campaign.  </p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/Pogue" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/Pogue</a></p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/Scobleizer" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/Scobleizer</a></p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/BestBuyCMO" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/BestBuyCMO</a></p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/LeoLaporte" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/LeoLaporte</a></p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/THErealDVORAK" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/THErealDVORAK</a></p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/LanceUlanoff" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/LanceUlanoff</a></p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/chrispirillo" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/chrispirillo</a></p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/ChrisBatDell" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/ChrisBatDell</a></p>
<p>Happy tweeting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuri</title>
		<link>http://blogs.amd.com/patmoorhead/2009/06/17/mobilemark-2007-the-apps-and-your-notebook/comment-page-1/#comment-1093</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.amd.com/patmoorhead/?p=1146#comment-1093</guid>
		<description>Off topic, but why cpu detail page on amd.com does not provide info about instruction sets and memory types supported by cpu? e.g</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Off topic, but why cpu detail page on amd.com does not provide info about instruction sets and memory types supported by cpu? e.g</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
