Posts tagged with LIVE!
Technology that “just works”
Posted by Patrick Moorhead in 11:52 AM
As I discussed in my first blog post, to do my job effectively, I need to stay very close and hands-on with technology. None of this ivory tower stuff for me…..well I keep it as limited as I can. Home technologies are one of my passions so it’s enjoyable as well. I am always amazed by those that “just work” and those that do not. I try to learn from those experiences and in addition to more formalized primary research programs, use this as information as guideposts to help improve AMD’s own solution offerings.
This weekend, I installed two new devices, a Linksys Gigabit wired/N wireless router (WRT310N) and Linksys’s newest Media Center Extender (DMA2200). It’s incredible how different my installation experiences were between these two products from the same company.
The router “just worked” and the media extender “just didn’t work”. Yes, I expect a router to be much simpler to install than a Windows media extender, but then again, I have a complex network…. I mix wired ethernet (Gb and 100Mb), wireless (B, G, and N), switches (Gb, 100Mb) connected to at least 15 different devices around the house. So when I replaced my 100Mb router with a Gb router and it just worked, I was amazed.
In contrast to this, I spent 8 hours on Saturday trying to get the media extender working correctly and reliably. It was regularly losing its connection to the PC with all my content, and as I’ve come to expect from a Windows media extender adapter, it had trouble with a number of codecs (I’ve discovered there are a number of codecs that Windows doesn’t like……. ironically most of the same ones that Apple likes….. or most of the open source ones. :>) I should know better, given that this is perhaps my 8th extender I have tried out with a similar result. For the record, I recommend to anyone that asks, if you really want to connect a computing device to a TV, do it with an AMD Cool’n'Quiet™PC and not a media extender.
As Nigel wrote here, on the consumer side, through our OEM customers and channels partners, we are trying to make technology solutions that are more fun and easier to use – better for gaming and better for media. That is really the basis for AMD LIVE! TM and AMD GAME! TM. The concept is simple….. in our experience, consumers like to play games and like to play and work with their photos, videos, and music. To do that effectively and efficiently requires different combinations of the right hardware, software, and services. We supply to our OEM customers and channel partners with specific hardware and software configurations to accomplish different levels of gaming (AMD GAME!/ AMD GAME! Ultra) and media (AMD LIVE!). If our OEM customers and channels choose, they can also use the AMD LIVE! or AMD GAME! badging in their marketing programs to signify that they are meeting these specifications. We also provide training and promotional materials to these business partners for use by their salespeople to better educate their own customers. For gaming end users, we also provide a deep content web site for gamers, with forums, downloads, promotions and educational materials .
In the end, technology is still too difficult for most folks and here at AMD one of our goals is to do our part to help improve gaming and media experiences for our OEM customers, channel partners, and most importantly, our end users.
Pat Moorhead is Vice President of Advanced Marketing at AMD. His postings are his own opinions and may not represent AMD’s positions, strategies or opinions. Links to third party sites are provided for convenience and unless explicitly stated, AMD is not responsible for the contents of such linked sites and no endorsement is implied.
Secret Find of the Family Network Administrator: HP MediaSmart Server
Posted by Patrick Moorhead in 12:14 PM
My name is Patrick Moorhead and I am vice president of advanced marketing at AMD. Most of what I focus on is the non-traditional marketing like developing the new strategies to change the ways we would like people to relate to AMD’s technologies, new ways to leverage our platforms into the marketplace and new ways to communicate them. I think a lot about why people think and behave the way they do and develop how AMD can meet the needs in the consumer and commercial space. On the consumer side, there is no better way to learn about consumer pain points than to “just do it,” and maybe even have a little fun along the way. I guess if that approach is good enough for Steve Jobs and Michael Dell, it has to be good enough for me. :>
I am a gadget guy, particularly on the home side, so I wanted to keep my first blog informative and light. In future blogs, I will be highlighting some of the industry’s misnomers or hype that need some light shed on them.
If you are also the Family Network Administrator (FNA), I want to let you in on a secret find I made over the the last few months: the HP MediaSmart Server. Normally I prefer to build my own rigs, so when I first heard about the MediaSmart server and its capabilities, I did a little bit of head-scratching. How wrong I was…….

I suppose “tech junkie” fully describes a household having 9 PCs, 3 DMAs (digital media adapter), 5 PMPs (portable media player), 4 DVRs (digital video recorder), 5TB storage, 3 switches, 1 router, an Xbox 360, 4 Nintendo DSs, a SlingBox and a 12Mbit internet connection. It is always a challenge to manage all of that technology and content, particularly keeping up with demands of the Moorhead User Group (MUG), already 4 members strong. MUG members include my wife and my three kids. The needs of MUG are far and wide, from crystal clear music to 15 years of pictures to the latest videos to 4 jitter-free game platform experiences to perfect internet connections …… all available 365 days a year, 24×7 in any room. Many of you can relate, I know, painfully, because you also need to manage all of that beautiful mess.
The HP MediaSmart Server simplifies and removes many of the mundane and often never implemented tasks like backups, network monitoring, and password and profile management. All of this stuff is automated and intuitive, unlike most consumer electronics and computer gear. The server also has some cool features like content sharing inside and outside of the house to your friends and family, and remote access to manage the network and PCs when the FNA is on a business trip. The HP MediaSmart server is powered by an AMD processor and is also part the AMD LIVE!™ family of products so you can really experience some AMD goodness, too!
Setup is easy. Attach the server to your wired network, load a CD on any PC you want connected, setup your passwords and you are on easy street. Now every PC and device in your house can share any of the same music, videos, movies, pictures and documents. Sounds easy and it is. It actually “works.”
It is kept safe and secure by password access control and with data replication. In other words, if you don’t want your 5 year old child to have rights to “delete” or “change” mom’s music files, you can restrict it. Complete or selective systems backups are done automagically without any effort but a mouse click. If data corruption is detected on the server, it will alert the FNA and because the data is replicated (written twice), it is safe and sound. The server will also alert the FNA if the backup was interrupted, anti-virus is out of date, malware detection is off, or if the firewall has been disabled.

The biggest benefit we experienced so far is the ability to have all of our music, video, and pictures in one place to “pull” from. Whether it’s one of the 5 iPods, Apple TV, Xbox 360, D-Link DSM-520, desktops, or laptops, they are all getting data from the same place, which means you are never hunting for that “one song that we downloaded on PC #5 that I can’t find anymore.” I am certain that when the first PC blows up and I can restore all of the data immediately, that will then be the next big feature I love. The other benefit is that the server can be left on all the time, and because it is very cool and quiet, it’s non-intrusive. Doing that on your main home PC is possible, but not optimal. The HP server hasn’t crashed once or turned off unexpectedly. It was built on Windows Server 2003 SP2, so you get years of real-world use before they sprung it on the consumer, as well as putting a happy face on it. And, no, I havent encountered any of the data integrity challenges written about.
Remote access was a surprise hit. When I was in Las Vegas recently and the “PC broke and couldn’t play music,” I logged into the PC at home in Austin, reloaded a piece of software, and got MUG happy again. I hope that boosts my customer sat score this month. I doubt it.
In my opinion, you don’t need to worry about losing the investment you may have made in USB or eSATA external storage. They plug right into the server and it automagically becomes part of the server’s storage capacity. Also, don’t worry about running out of storage capacity any time soon. The HP MediaSmart server comes in two configurations, 500GB ($599) and 1TB ($749). It comes with 2 extra SATA hard drive bays so you can add two of the highest capacity SATA drives you can find when you need it. As it comes to storage, I recommend only buying it when you need it because the price per MB decreases so rapidly. When I checked today, I could buy 1TB SATA drive on Newegg for $199, so it seems to me that, when you need more next year, it could be half that price or at least much cheaper.

The next feature I want to test is the ability to invite friends and family to view and even post their pictures to the MUG server. Sort of my own protected Flickr. I am not sure exactly the incremental benefit that provides versus the photo posting services, but we will see. For the daring FNAs out there who want to build their own server, Microsoft sells Windows Home Server, the OS that HP has built their own server upon. Some of my compadres have built a beast of a server on this platform and it takes what HP has developed and extended the functionality to things like encoding video and audio content. HP has kept it simple, focused and didn’t overextend themselves in the spirit of maximizing the feature list. What it does, it does well.
I would love to hear from my fellow FNAs managing their home technology installations and how you deal with the complexity and management.
I’m a fan of benchmarks. I think they are very helpful in allowing consumers to make informed purchase decisions about products. But they generally have some flexibility built into them so you can focus on those elements you want. And this means you can use a benchmark to tell a number of stories – which means you can choose to tell the story you want.
For example, take a recent review by AnandTech entitled “Sixteen Cores, Four Sockets” published on June 17, 2008. This article featured Quad-Core AMD Opteron™ processor-based systems. One of the performance evaluations in this article was a SPECjbb2005 benchmark estimate. What is particularly interesting about this article is that the published estimates list the 4 socket server running AMD Opteron processors model 8356 as 25% faster than the competition while running at similar frequencies and 7% faster than the fastest competitive solution. These results vary widely from the official scores posted on the SPEC site. Now you might ask – how can that be? How can you run what is considered to be an industry standard benchmark and get a different set of numbers? That can’t be right!
Taking a closer look at the SPECjbb2005 benchmark helps to unravel this mystery. SPECjbb2005 is a memory-intensive benchmark that is intended to evaluate the performance of servers running typical Java business applications. Its results evaluate the interaction of the CPU, caches, memory hierarchy, JVM (Java Virtual Machine), and JIT (Just-In-Time) compiler. SPECjbb2005 can be configured to run in a variety of ways, resulting in different performance outcomes. Different configuration = different story. For example, you can get different results based on the operating system used, the version of JVM used, the level of optimization of the JVM and JIT, JVM tuning options, and thread allocations.
The SPECjbb2005 scores published by SPEC tend to be achieved using very aggressive software tuning and processor settings. These settings help to achieve a “best possible score” but do not necessarily reflect how a system would be configured in a data center environment to provide the most stable and efficient performance. The scores published in the AnandTech article, according to the author, are more likely to reflect real world configurations with optimizations used consistent over the different processor architectures.
Indeed – if you do a survey around the internet you can find reference to other SPECjbb2005 scores and estimates that reflect a variety of configuration options and the resulting differences in the benchmark scores:
http://blogs.sun.com/bmseer/entry/sun_fire_x4440_best_opteron
Blog featuring SPECjbb2005 results with the 4 socket Sun Fire x4440 running quad-core AMD Opteron processors with Solaris 10 and Sun JVM. Also highlights power consumption of featured systems – reminding us that in today’s economy of escalating energy costs raw performance has less meaning to data centers than performance/watt.
http://techreport.com/articles.x/13176/4
An article by TechReport featuring SPECjbb2005 estimates for 2 socket servers running quad-core processors with Windows Server 2003 x64 edition and the Sun JVM. The author states the goal of this performance evaluation was to test relative performance on equal footing.
Taking a closer look at the official SPECjbb2005 scores and the estimates published in the various articles, you can see how confusing a benchmark can be. This serves as a reminder to us that benchmarks are just an indicator of performance and that a benchmark like SPECjbb2005, which allows for a wide variety of configurations, can produce a wide variety of results. And remember – the story being told is not always the one that best reflects reality….
Pat Moorhead is Vice President of Advanced Marketing at AMD.His postings are his own opinions and may not represent AMD’s positions, strategies or opinions. Links to third party sites are provided for convenience and unless explicitly stated, AMD is not responsible for the contents of such linked sites and no endorsement is implied.

















(4.43 out of 5)